Saturday, April 11, 2015

Practice Paper 1 - Political Speech


The text I will be analysing is President Lyndon B. Johnson's special message to the Congress : The American Promise March 15, 1965.

     It is well known that during the 1960's the African American community had not gained their voting rights. President Johnson encouraged Congress to pass the voting right act. He expressed this through his famous speech "We shall overcome", which was delivered on March 15 , 1965. This speech is identified as a political speech due the fact that it contains features of a speech such as rhetorical devices, persuasion methods, and the use of ethos , pathos and logos.

    The target audience of this speech are the members of Congress however Johnson is also targeting the people of America therefore he is not only asking the Congress to pass the voting right act but also asking the American people. In the text he directs a point to both members of the Congress and others who were present and all the people watching sine he mentions in the text "to all the nation tonight".  This shows that he is not only concerned about the political aspect of the voting issue but the ethical aspect of the issue as well sine he is also attempting to rally the support of the American people. Throughout the speech , and ideal amount of persuasion methods were used. Johnson uses pathos in his speech to get persuade the audience to support his cause. He mentions the amount of violence that was used recently in Alabama which was caused by men and women protesting against their denial for the right to vote. Johnson uses this to persuade the American people and the Congressmen by appealing to their emotions in order to support his cause. In order to do this he seized the opportunity to mention the Selma massacre. He also puts himself into the speech. He implies that he is part of the American people, there he did not only try and make the people view him as the leader of America, but made himself be viewed as part of people of the United States. He uses the word "we" as he considers himself as one of the people. He uses we in the the famous line "We shall overcome". He then again appeals to the audience's emotions as he implies that he too wants something to be done to the situation with the civil rights for the African American people. This adds pathos due to the fact that he includes his emotions with the emotions of the people.

    What gives Johnson more of a reason to recite this speech is the fact that Johnson used to be the Majority Leader in Senate as he worked to help different aspects of the Civil Rights movement of 1957. He believes that American should get rid of its racial discrimination. Johnson refers to different text from American history. He gives examples from the Constitution , and the Emancipation Proclamation to support his arguments. This could be used as an example of logos as he allows the audience to understand and connect the dots between the different periods of time This also is helpful as it is a great way to persuade the members of the Congress as it tells them how the country should be governed whist referring to previous constitutions and supporting his arguments. The tone of the speech is hopeful as he always refers to a better and brighter America. He says what he would like to happen and how he would like america to change but in the same time appealing to the peoples emotions.

   In conclusion, this text uses many rhetorical devices and an ideal amount of persuasion methods that helped persuade the people of Congress and the American people which were his target audience.    
Johnsons speech will be remembered as the speech that helped racism and pass the voting rights to the African American Community.

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

IOC practice

The tempest act 3 scene 2 analysis (IOP practice). https://soundcloud.com/mohamed-abousen/tempest

IOC practice

The tempest act 3 scene 2 analysis (IOP practice). https://soundcloud.com/mohamed-abousen/tempest

Monday, February 2, 2015

Most Meaningful Takeaway

How To Tame A Wild Tongue 




The whole article was great and had a lot of quotes and meanings, but what my group and I found most intriguing was a quote that really hit me. "So, if you really want to hurt me, talk badly about my language". Anzaldua also mentioned   "Ethnic identity is twin to linguistic identity- I am my language". This shows how much Anzaldua takes pride in her language. As mentioned before in class, a person's language and culture is what defines, without culture or a language, you will not belong anywhere and you will not have an identity. This is of the main reasons Anzaldua doesn't want to let her language leave. 

Another way Anzaldua connects language to identity is by using historical details to show how changes in the Chicano language affected the people as a whole. She makes various distinctions between Chicano Spanish and the standard Spanish spoken in Mexico and most other parts of the world. She makes the point that the new language came out of necessity because Chicanos didn’t feel a connection to either American English or Mexican Spanish, and they had no other way to connect themselves and to identify themselves as a people than by creating a new language to bond them together. The new language became an integral part of Chicano identity as it helped the people identify themselves with others of their ethnicity. Later on in the essay, Anzaldua alludes to various Chicano musicians,writers, and even films made her feel more pride not only in the Chicano language, but in herself, showing the strong connection between language and identity. 



Monday, January 19, 2015

Where do we see evidence of linguistic imperialism in the Anglophone world?

What is linguistic imperialism ? The basic meaning of linguistic imperialism is the transfer of a dominant language to other people and in this case the dominant language is the English language. In our rapidly globalising world today, the English language is becoming the most dominant language in the world. There appeared a number of modern purposes, determining the predominant position of the English language and allowing to retain its importance in the world society. My own opinion is that all people must know English to a certain degree to use as a common language throughout the world, but learn their native language as well. The most important factor in the majority of English speaking people, from whom English is their native language. Another important factor is that knowing English gives people great opportunities for studying, business, international career and travelling. English is a language of international community. It is in its way of world society of the epoch of globalisation  The number of people in the world speaking English is more than one billion people, only a quarter of them consider English as their mother language. Today we see that English seriously strengthens its positions as the language of international communication not only is Europe, but in the whole world. As evidence, today the international conferences, symposiums are held mainly in English. Most universities around the world demand applications in correct formal English. One of the main reasons that children abandon their native language (which is one of the main causes for the extinction of languages) is due to the fact of them being too lazy to learn it or due to them being embarrassed to speak it in public. In an Indian boarding school, the students were not aloud to speak their native languages. When a person abandons their native language, they abandon their culture and more importantly their identity. UAE is arab country yet in all the school here, Mathematics ,Sciences and other subjects , are all taught in English. I speak more English at home than Arabic even though my parents are Arab. When people go out in this country the majority speak English not arabic. That is due to the fact that they are being taught to speak English in school. That is why Education is an example to where we see linguistic imperialism in the world today. 

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Oxfam International - Food crisis in Sahel.

The text is created by Oxfam International and was published in 2011. It discusses the impending food crises in Sahel. The author begins the article with a brief summary of what the article is actually about. Whilst taking a closer look at the article, there is a sense of advertising for the charity Oxfam rather than informing people about the crisis. The author is yet undeniably informing the audience of the food crisis in Sahel and what is being done to aid this problem, but they are as well trying to make the people donate to this organisation. The text was made for those with a strive to aid for the organisation. The style of the text is not formal, thus implying that the text is for everyone to read making it easier to be read by people of all ages. The text is not intended towards a specific gender. 

In the beginning of the article, harsh images shows the people and the harsh conditions they are living in. This is shared to the people reading the text making them feel bad and in a way persuading them to give money to the organisation.  The text then speaks about the images and the crisis and basically the problem is summarised. The style in which the author writes the text is very persuasive as it talks about the situation in Sahel and what they are doing to fix it. He mixes up a serious text with a persuasive text to make the reader really think about what he is reading. One of the many ways he persuades the audience is by using logos. The author uses many numbers and statistics in the text to help persuade the readers. 
 
Although the author uses a lot of logos in his text, ethos is used as well to change the mood of the text and appeal to the readers emotions. The style in which the author writes in the text is as, I mentioned before ,  very persuasive. It is obvious that the author intends to reach world wide readers for the text is not as formal. The author uses many persuasive techniques in the text which helps the fact that the text isn't only to inform the people but to let them pay money to the organisation. The author adds sentences such as "In Chad 13 out of 22 regions could be affected by this food crisis". This makes the reader really feel sorry for the people and feel bad if they don't donate. 

As I mentioned before, images are shown in the beginning of the video which really makes people feel for the people. Even though the article seems more like an ad for the organisation, it does well to inform the people about the problems and about how to aid the people and help educate the readers about the situation in Sahel.